Diphallia is the medical term for having two penises. Not to be confused with Penile Subincision, which is self-inflicted (do not under any circumstances do a google image search on Penile Subincision ), people are born with diphallia.

Usually birth defects are off-limits in my book, but just think of all the sexual possibilities it could open up here: You know that awkward moment when you’re trying really hard to make a double-penetration work, but one of the three people in the equation is simply not flexible enough? Not a problem if one of the tops has diphallia. If a greedy bottom was lucky enough to find two tops with diphallia? The mythical quadruple penetration is suddenly within reach!

Today, a bisexual man with two uncut cocks and who likes to get fisted, is doing an AMA (ask me anything) on Reddit, and the questions and answers are fascinating to say the least. Check out the highlights on The Sword.

More diphallia pictures after the jump (I never imagined in a million years that I would write that.)

Here’s “DoubleDickDude”from Reddit in various states of erection:

There’s lots of obviously photoshopped diphallia pics floating around the internet, so I guess it must be a gay fetish. Ray Dragon sadly only has one penis:

Another pretty obviously fake (and totes gross) one:

More fun facts about diphallia:

• It’s a very rare condition: With only around 1,000 reported cases ever, its estimates to occur in about 5.5 million men in the United States. Therefore, if my math is correct, there’s about 27 men in the US who have it. 
• Diphallia is a not a genetic mutation — it’s a congenital abnormality.
• Diphallia is believed to occur in the fetus between the 23rd and 25th days of gestation when an injury, chemical stress, or malfunctioning homeobox genes hamper proper function of the caudal cell mass of the fetal mesoderm as the urogenital sinus separates from the genital tubercle and rectum to form the penis.

The reddit guy refuses to show his face and has will not do porn (gay or straight). I even asked him personally and he said no:


I realize it’s a long shot, but if any GayPornBlog readers out there “suffer” from this affliction, or know anyone who does, please drop me a line: I think you can be famous!

Hot or gross? Is Diphallia the gay porn fetish of 2014?

RELATED:
I am the guy with two penises. (Reddit)
This man has two penises. Both are fat and uncut. (The Sword)

The gay porn industry is in a strange state of flux with regard to the use of condoms in videos. Over the last several years, we’ve seen many of the newer, online studios produce bareback content (e.g. Sean Cody, Next Door Studios, Bel Ami), while the older, more established studios (Hot House, COLT, Titan, Channel 1, and Falcon/Raging Stallion) have remained steadfast in their commitment to make condom-only videos.

Lance Luciano and Ray Diaz in Falcon’s “California Dreamin’ 1″

With their newest release, “California Dreamin’ 1″, Falcon has found a unique way to address the issue: Director Tony Dimarco and Falcon’s post-production team have digitally removed condoms from the video to create “a completely safe sex movie that mostly appears to be a bareback release.” (Note: All un-watermarked images in this post are screen-grabs from Falcon’s “California Dreamin 1″)

Close-up of Lance Luciano fucking Ray Diaz: Where’s the condom?

Dimarco described it as “a throwback to the classic, pre-condom Falcon poolside movies from the 70′s and 80′s.”  He  added, “With this movie I really wanted to capture the essence of that time, when life seemed more carefree and spontaneous. In keeping with this concept, I felt that condoms need to be addressed. I wanted to give the impression of a pre-condom movie, but use condoms as we do in every scene we film. I found a way to film the movie safely and effectively, while giving the experience that I had intended and using the hottest modern stars.”

Check out more images and the trailer from “California Dreamin’ 1″ after the jump:

Ryan Rose and Ray Han

Will this new technique put an end to the stormy condom vs. bareback porn debate that’s been raging for years? Probably not. But it will be interesting to see how fans react and Falcon/Raging Stallion Studios President Chris Ward thinks this move could be a game changer for the industry. Ward declared that this “will go down as a defining moment in the production of safe, top-quality male erotica.” He added: “The innovation and use of technology to make condoms less ‘in your face’ is something that allows us to appeal to all porn fans while protecting our actors’ health.”

Close-up of Ryan Rose fucking Ray Han

“California Dreamin’ 1″ stars exclusives Ryan Rose, Ray Diaz and Donnie Dean, it also features Angel Rock, Lance Luciano, Ray Han, Adam Wirthmore and Liam Magnuson in his final scene before retiring. “California Dreamin’ 1″ will be available for pre-sale on the Falcon Store starting tomorrow. 

Angel Rock fucking Adam Wirthmore

Liam Magnuson and Donnie Dean

Interestingly, you can see that condoms were used in the glamor images they’ve released from the film:

Angel Rock and Adam Wirthmore

Liam Magnuson and Donnie Dean

Ryan Rose and Ray Han

Ryan Rose and Ray Han

Ryan Rose and Ray Han

California Dreamin 1 (via Falcon Blog)

Related:
FalconStudios.com
RagingStallion.com

Of course it was just a matter of time until we saw absurdly hot former Marine turned underwear model Alex Minsky naked. Its unclear where these pics came from (although, given how much he seems to like all the attention he’s been getting, some are speculating that he’s leaked them himself).

Either way, he’s got a pretty fucking nice cock, making him 3 for 3 (face, body, dick).

Let’s just hope these pictures are him taking one step towards his gay porn debut.

Check out the mouth-watering pics after the jump …

(Via Hot As Fuck Blog)

Previously:

Absurdly Hot Former Marine Alex Minsky Becomes An Underwear Model

What gay porn star donned “Justify My Love”-era Madonna drag for the cover of a new magazine?

The answer after the jump …

That would be Francois Sagat in Madonna drag (who else?!) and the image purports to be the cover of new gay magazine called Loverboy.  The magazine promises:

Drag Queens. Porn Stars. A to Z Listers. And Francois Sagat channeling Madonna….Yes, in Issue #1 we’ll be bringing you a mélange of all things camp, glossy, gritty, dirty and hot. Here’s just a taste of what to expect – Francois Sagat giving you full on Madonna “Justify My Love”-era realness….

Francois says “I could only re-incarnate Madonna’s early 90s look because back then she was the ‘gay’ fantasy, she was presenting what gay men think is feminine. The look was beyond true femininity, it was ‘hyper-feminine.’ But my face is so sharp, I think it would have been useless to try and make it softer… I could easily look like a mix between Madonna and Glenn Close. The transformation worked so well because we both have the same bodies!! LOL, only joking…People keep saying I’m trying to do these pop stars in drag. So ok, let’s do this properly. Let’s do the QUEEEEENNNN!”

I think he nails the Madonna look pretty well!

 That being said, here’s Francois how I prefer him: Naked, no makeup, and getting fucked (in this case by Spencer Reed and Shay Michaels):

 (Image from TitanMen’s “Incubus”)

RELATED:

More Francois Sagat on GayPornBlog
More Francois Sagat in Madonna Drag at Loverboy Magazine
More Francois gay porn on TitanMen.com
More dramatic transformations in the “Gay Porn Before & After” archive

Early this morning, Denver Fox News affiliate KDVR was reporting on a helicopter crash in Seattle when — for no apparent reason whatsoever — a picture of a rather large, uncut dick flashed on-screen.

When they cut back to the anchors, they all had rather priceless looks on their faces, but otherwise didn’t skip a beat and just kept on yapping …

Better than earthquake reaction videos! Fox affil accidentally shows a penis https://t.co/ZkbSqHGOs3 (nsfw obvs) pic.twitter.com/cGnvd1VsjU

— Slade Sohmer (@SladeHV) March 18, 2014

The station has since issued a statement on the incident. They are sowwwy:

While reporting breaking news about the crash of the KOMO-TV helicopter in Seattle, FOX31 Denver accidentally broadcast an offensive photo while scrolling live through a Twitter feed of pictures from the crash scene.
The photo was mistakenly broadcast by our control room. It did not come from the tablet many viewers saw being used by one of our anchors.
We apologize for the inadvertent broadcast of the image and we are taking immediate steps to prevent such an accident from happening again.

Oooopsy.

[h/t Deadspin]

The infinite number of monkeys typing at an infinite number of computers that is known as The Internet has spawned another new greatest thing ever: gay porn star cartoon animated gifs: HornyToons Gifs is a tumblr devoted to gifs of gay porn stars, male models and the like getting felt up by your favorite cartoon characters. I don’t know who has this much free time on their hands, but I’m glad they do. 

I Just can’t decide what’s more exciting: the gifs themselves or the fact that I can finally work Tina from “Bob’s Burgers” into a blog entry.  

Why are Francois Sagat’s genitals scaring the bejesus out of poor Finn?

Gary the Snail, has the right idea — going after  Sagat’s chocolate starfish: 

Alex Minsky’s good leg getting kissed by a vintage Mickey

See the rest after the jump … if you dare …

Linda Belcher blathering on and on about something (like she does) to Francois mid-section:

The Earl of Lemongrab got sucked up into between Samuel O’Toole’s massive muscle butt:

Lumpy Space Princess is cock-blocking the dudes from Sean Cody (As USUAL!)

Jake Genesis may have found Jesus, but he doesn’t let that stand in his way for having an orgy with Gunther, Gunder, Goonder, Goonthy, and Gonter.

Jay Roberts is taking a dip with Ariel:

Is that Colby Keller  (?) is defiling poor Gunther?

Jake and Finn are (understandably) dumbfounded by Dave Franco’s self-love:

But nothing’s gonna get in-between Tina and a good time tonight:

Although I’m lying in bed laughing my ass off looking at these, I’m sure someone somewhere in a dark basement is jerking off to them.

See the rest at HornyToons Gifs (and thank you, whoever you are).

Yesterday, California State Assembly Bill AB1576 cleared its first hurdle and moved past the Labor and Employment Committee. The bill would require porn producers in California to not only use condoms, but require testing for performers. Most of the attention has been focused on the “straight” side of the industry, which currently uses 14-day testing system and now would be required to use condoms as well. But the bill’s affect on the gay porn — and gay men — could be even greater.

Currently, the gay porn industry has no unified policy toward HIV. Some, like Treasure Island, celebrate HIV positive performers and allow them to perform without condoms. Others use testing systems similar to the straight side, or serosort (matching positive with positive, negative with negative). Others use condoms exclusively, not only to prevent the transmission of HIV, but also to keep from having to discriminate against HIV positive performers. AB1576 would not only require condoms in all productions, it would ban HIV positive performers from performing in porn — regardless of whether they used a condom.

The gay community’s relationship with HIV — and HIV discrimination — is much more nuanced than the straight industry. Reading through some of the straight porn news blogs — the equivalents of things like Gay Porn Blog and The Sword — is like stepping back in time to 1983.  I’ll spare you the nastiest bits, but it boils down to “HIV is a gay disease brought to the straight industry by crossover (bisexual) performers, who should be outted and exiled.” While we’ve spent the last 30 years learning to mitigate risk, to talk viral load and PrEP,  and informed consent, they still take up pitchforks against us to protect innocent white women.

AB1576 Sponsor Isadore Hall

I wish I could say it was different on the political side. But AB1576 is essentially a legislative outgrowth of these same fears. As unbelievable as it seems, given the screaming headlines, the straight industry has not had an on-set transmission of HIV since 2004. But for right-wing bloggers and politicians, HIV is forever lurking at the door. So AB1576, a bill designed with vulnerable women in mind, requires both condoms and testing. While that may make straight people feel safer (and politicians feel grander), it would essentially require the gay porn industry to fire anyone with HIV. 

There was a time when I was vigorously opposed to bareback porn. I was — and still am — vigorously in support of workplace safety. However, I also know that there’s something wrong in having the state say tell gay men that regardless of viral load, regardless of whether they use a condom in their personal life, regardless of the actual science, or whether you’ve discussed status with your partner, or whether you’re wearing a condom, that if you’re HIV-positive you need to be cast out. 

Nevermind that in the past few months, several studies have come out showing that it’s near impossible to transmit the virus from someone with an undetectable viral load, or to someone who is taking a medication like Truvada. This bill — and the moral panic behind it — is from another era.

Perhaps not surprisingly, AB1576 is sponsored by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, a controversial LA-based lobby that is similarly opposed to medication like Truvada and has used its high-profile attacks on the porn industry to drive a huge increase in fundraising.

Yesterday, I testified in Sacramento against the bill (only to be shut down from the Chair). Instead, what the committee heard — and voted on — was the testimony of two performers, Rod Daily and Cameron Bay, who contracted HIV in their personal life. Nevermind that the bill wouldn’t have prevented either seroconversion (Daily performed exclusively in condom scenes, and everyone that Bay ever performed with tested negative). The committee hearings were part sermon, part scare tactics about the evils of pornography. Science was left at the door. If the bill passes, so too will gay men and three decades of progress against HIV.

–  Mike

Update: A reader pointed out this was from a photo set from FamousMales.UK.Net, and there’s a whole mess of them (after the jump)

Various blogs are reporting today that a nude photo was “leaked” of Welsh rugby player Tim Oakes. 

The thing is, there’s leaked photos (say, the casual iPhone mirror pic that was clearly meant to be sent as sext) but then there’s this pic of Tim: Fully erect (and huge) uncut cock, suspiciously perfect lighting, body positioned to best showcase his musculature. To me, this is hardly a “leaked” nude photo, but rather some kind of elaborate PR stunt (I am, after all, talking about rugby on a gay porn blog). Let’s call a spade a spade: this is a meticulously posed gay porn glamor shot not a “leaked photo”.

Not that I’m complaining.

Check out Tim Oakes in all his naked, erect, uncut glory after the jump …

Naked rugby player Tim Oakes

(H/T “Welsh Rugby Player Tim Oakes Nude”, HotAsFuck Blog)

Here’s more from the set from FamousMales.UK.Net, ca. 2009:

There’s also videos of Tim Oakes jerking off here.

Wearing but a harness, the darling of gay porn Christian Wilde explains why — in no uncertain terms — he’s strongly opposed to CA AB 1576, the “condom bill” which would establish criminal penalties for any porn shoot where a performer choses not to wear a condom.

It would also require every performer to disclose sensitive personal and medical information to any studio they shoot for, and require any adult film producer to keep all performers’ personal medical information on file indefinitely.

Euphemistically being called the “Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act’,” it is really anything but. Opposed by both porn performers and filmmakers because it puts performers’ health at risk, it would also effectively force the adult film industry in California to move out of state and even possibly go underground, putting thousands of people who work in the adult industry out of jobs as well as costing the state of CA millions (if not billions) in lost revenues.

After the jump, watch Christian’s impassioned plea against AB 1576, learn how certain parties (like Michael Weinstein’s AIDS Healthcare Foundation) stand to make a lot of money off this and what you can do to let your voice against this potentially disastrous bill to be heard.

Industry-backed site StopAB1576 offers several more important reasons why not only this bill should be opposed, but also some of the hidden agenda behind the people who are pouring tons of cash into passing this bill.

Why AB1576 Should Be Opposed (via StopAB1576:)

• The bill would require that a condom be worn for all vaginal and anal scenes. Performers would have no choice.
• The regulations imposed by this bill would force most companies to leave California. This would mean the loss of thousands of jobs — not only the jobs of performers, but also editors, makeup artist, graphic designers, marketing teams, IT experts, accountants, security guards, craft services, project managers, talent bookers … the list goes on and on.
• If the industry is forced to move out of state or underground, the already effective performer-developed and performer-enforced health and safety protocols the industry has in place will be jeopardized – meaning that this bill would actually reduce the on-the-job safety of those workers it claims to protect.
• The bill requires anyone identified as a “producer” to keep performer medical test results on file indefinitely every time a scene is filmed. This would include not only larger companies with stringent record keeping systems, but amateur producers who may not have the resources to keep sensitive medical information secure. The potential for privacy violations is frightening.

The Hidden Agenda: Why AB1576 Is Really Being Introduced:

• “[Michael Weinstein] concedes that the campaign is a public-relations windfall: ‘We got more publicity for safer sex and condoms than we ever could have gotten any other way.’” Seema Mehta and Abby Sewell, “Michael Weinstein, leader in AIDS movement, has hard-charging style”, Los Angeles Times (January 3, 2014)
• “This isn’t the first time AHF has fought progress by taking a position that ignores scientific evidence and sets it apart from the HIV/AIDS community. Some suggest the organization manufactures controversy to keep its name in the headlines and stay relevant.” James Loduca, Vice President, Philanthropy & Public Affairs at San Francisco AIDS Foundation, Unconditional Love and PrEP, Huffington Post (April 23, 2006).
• “Contrary to some high-minded 1st Amendment motivation, he’s shown to be a thug,’ the supervisor said of Weinstein. ‘He’s used his nonprofit organization in a crass and bullying political way to get his way, which is to avoid being held accountable.’” Abby Sewell, Animosity between head of AIDS group, L.A. County supervisor emerges, Los Angeles Times (February 12, 2014).
• “Mr. Weinstein’s anti-PrEP position is an extension of his long-standing anti-promiscuity crusade and more importantly his continuation of harmful shame tactics.” Michael Lucas, Op-Ed: The Danger in Calling PrEP a “Party Drug”, OUT Magazine (April 14, 2004).

If you want to stand with porn performers and producers to fight this terrifyingly egregious bill, check out   these four things you can do to help.

Although sadly no longer doing porn, Connor Kline is managing to keep himself busy. Like many retired gay porn stars before him, he can now call himself a fashion model, as he’s the face of the GODDESS Clothing Summer 2014 collection.

GODDESS is the brainchild of recent fashion school graduate David Sifert. Like his popular blog Bears I’m Jealous Of, David’s line GODDESS pays homage to the beefy, masculine form while sort of turning it on its head at the same time. I sat down with him to find out how he hooked up with Connor as well as get some more insight into his new label. GayPornBlog: Why did you pick Connor to be the face of your new line?

David: I chose to work with Connor because he has such a great look that fit so well with my new collection! The collection is called BEAUTIFUL BRO and Connor’s handsome, all-American look is just what I wanted to help get the message of the collection across.

What is the message of BEAUTIFUL BRO?

I liked the way “Beautiful Bro” sounded and “Bros” are something that people haven’t explored before in fashion. People don’t like bros, but I think they’re cool. I think it’s subversive to play with the notion of celebrating something that people don’t really like.

What was it like shooting with Connor Kline?

Connor was great to shoot with. He is so sweet and professional and every shot turned out so great. It is easy to see why he has been so successful in the past and I’d love to work with him again in the future. Is this Connor’s first foray into fashion modeling?

Connor has done some underwear modeling before but as far as I know, the GODDESS collection is his first time modeling for a fashion label. He is definitely a natural though so I wouldn’t be surprised to see him modeling for more designers in the future. What is your definition of a “Bro”?

Let’s see how I can answer that … it’s about masculine men … guys who aren’t necessarily chauvinistic but are brash and do what they like. I also like the creepy incest undertone of it. Will I get in trouble for saying that? (laughs) Not at all! It’s always been a popular theme in gay porn. Can you describe some of the pieces?

This season I have a bomber jacket printed with some art I did with a bling print. I did some graphic and image tees. I included a lot of prints and patterns and colors, sticking mainly to primary colors and black and white. I tried to keep it super-wearable so it can fit into a lot of different people’s wardrobes. The collection is unisex so girls or guys could wear it.

Can you tell us a more about the GODDESS label as a whole?

GODDESS is a designer streetwear label that is all about inclusion and subversion. Some pieces are inspired by gay subculture but at the same time they’re not intended for any specific audience so I think anyone can find something from GODDESS that suits their unique personality.

If you had to pick one piece from your collection, which one do you think GayPornBlog readers would like best?

Definitely the Turkish Oil wrestler tank top:

(All Photos by Clare Gatto and Kara Gut, styling by Mitch McGuire.)

MORE:

Check out GODDESS Clothing

Connor Kline on NakedSword

Connor Kline on FalconStudios.com

Connor Kline (as “Brice”) on SeanCody

David Forest, one of gay porn’s longest running (and most notorious) manager and “agent to the stars” started in the industry when he became friends with and started managing the career of Leo Ford in 1981. Since then, he’s negotiated contracts and managed the careers from some of the most iconic names in the industry. He’s also seen it undergo radical changes — from VHS to DVD to Internet, and all the while he’s always had very a strong point of view about how things should be.

In the following exclusive guest entry, Mr. Forest he discusses the pros and cons of signing an exclusive contracts while recounting some of the biggest contracts he’s negotiated over the past 30 years. It should be required reading for any porn stars out there considering signing an exclusive contract …

Ken Ryker
(former Falcon Exclusive)

To Be or Not To Be An Exclusive (with a studio or Internet company)? If the old mainstream saying, “The artist reigns supreme” is also the way that the adult biz should work … why does it seem that exclusives lose control to the studios and producers? Making your star an exclusive is sometimes just an easy way for a manager or agent to earn a signing bonus and not have to worry about finding bookings for the star. It also puts the studio in control of the artist’s career. Pay off the agent/manager so he’s happy and won’t interfere with the artists’ career.

How many mainstream actors/actresses are exclusives with a certain studio? That set-up was tried years ago but failed. When a star loses control of a career, the studio becomes in charge and thinks only about what’s right for them. And, the adult studios have been known to sign a star as an exclusive, use/abuse their services as they see fit … then, when they think there’s nothing more to get from the star … they drop him or tell him he’s free to seek work elsewhere. If there are remaining scenes/movies due on the contract … it’s the old, “sue us” response.

Caesar
(former Catalina Exclusive)

Most exclusive deals don’t take into account the stars’ possible increase in popularity, demand and acting ability. The deals are based on X number of scenes/movies for X number of dollars each … sometimes with a specific end date for the deal (not always). One major studio used to tie up their exclusives by promising them a bonus payment (equal to their scene rate) if they completed all the scenes on the contract …. But … there would be a date they had to wait until before the bonus would be awarded.

A famous internet company would pay big money for a star to do a scene for them …. But required an exclusive period AFTER the scene was shot before they could shoot for another producer. If the star sold … they’d resign him for another exclusive period. If not, they just kissed him and wished him well.

Eric Hanson
(former Falcon Exclusive)

Many of the older exclusive deals were worded in such a way that the star had to hold himself exclusive for the studio … but … the studio had no legal responsibility to hire the star. Tie up the stars’ career with no guaranteed income or roles.

These days, the stars that sign exclusive deals get less than fabulous money for way too many scenes/movies. Their careers have very little shelf life left when the contract is over. That’s why you see stars that move to other studios/internet companies with a name change to try and make them seem like “new meat.” Same guy, same dick, new name. Studios are famous for asking stars to appear in movies that aren’t exactly perfect for them … but … it helps the studio out for sales.

Christian Fox
(former Falcon Exclusive)

The old, “lifetime exclusive” deal always gave me a chuckle. The deal was for the “lifetime” that the star was in good graces with the studio. When the relationship soured … so did the lifetime.

Most of the gay adult world’s famous, biggest selling stars did not have exclusive deals to launch their careers. Studios were also known for “swapping” exclusives. If one had the perfect vehicle but the star was signed somewhere else … they simply offered the studio holding the contract a future role for another of their stars. Most of those deals are still waiting to be honored.

Billy Brandt
(former Falcon & Pacific Sun Exclusive)

Many stars have had multiple exclusive deals over the course of their careers. They hang their hats wherever they’re wanted … thinking that they’ll make more money and have more work as an exclusive. Their hats usually end up becoming very dusty … sometimes the studio they end up at closes, gets sold or changes personnel that they never even meet.

Occasionally a star has had multiple exclusive deals going at the same time. And, some studios tell stars to feel free to get work from other places, even though they’re supposedly under contract to one firm. Takes the pressure off the exclusive studio when the star’s career is getting tired.

To be fair, I didn’t mention any specific names above. But, in conclusion, I want to briefly comment about an exclusive deal (that I designed, obviously). But, first, I had to have the star’s Falcon exclusive deal terminated. Since Billy wouldn’t bottom (at that time) … and since Falcon just had nothing more for him to do as a top … John Rutherford, the gentleman that he is, gave Billy a release. That contract had an escalating scene price … I think it was up to $3000 when the contract was terminated.

Jeff Palmer
(former Falcon Exclusive)

Coming off the $15,000 deal I had just made for Jeff Palmer to star in the very successful, “Palmer’s Lust” (my great friend Thor Stephan did an amazing job directing) with Motti at Pacific Sun Entertainment (Jeff’s Falcon exclusive deal ended and they didn’t want to resign him) … my relationship with Pacific Sun was sizzling.

Motti saw that he could do a movie with a $75,000 budget and make money. So … I told him I wanted $25,000 for BILLY BRANDT to do three (3) Pacific Sun movies (total for the 3). But, he had to pay Billy $500 per week for 1 year (actually, 50 weeks) …. And finish production on all 3 movies in that year.

Jason Adonis (former Jet Set, Falcon, Athletic Model Guild & Raging Stallion Exclusive)

My commission would be paid by Billy out of his weekly salary ($75). I knew that if Billy could look forward to $425 net every week for a year … we’d get the 3 movies made. AND … we did. Not easily (LOL) … but we got them all done. Phil St. John, Thor Stephan and Michael Zen (famous editor/director of mainly straight films) were the 3 directors.

Billy’s Pacific Sun exclusive deal was a shining example of a great deal for everyone. Billy’s 3 Pacific Sun movies were hits. Motti’s sale of Pacific Sun was surely helped by the success of those films (and the Jeff Palmer movie, a Caesar/Chris Steele film and a Billy Herrington title that I set up).

– David Forest, FUNintheFOREST (official site)

(All of the Stars Pictured Above Were Represented By David Forest At Various Times of their Careers)